<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><br><div dir="ltr"><span style="line-height:15px;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;font-size:13px;font-family:inherit;vertical-align:baseline">Hi, <br>
I am strong follower of abiotic origin of hydrocarbons and there is no doubt even that hydrocarbons has been formed in the deep origin of earth without any involvement <br>of organic matter from the surface of the earth. but we can not ignore the strong past experience of link between the organic rich source rock and reservoir. we can not <br>
ignore the strong chemical analysis of its link with the living organism and can be nicely justify in abiotic theory. <br>2. If we want to prove the abiotic origin of hydrocarbons we must respect these strong evidences. according to me there is no need to ignore these evidences by the <br>
followers of biotic theory but these evidences are strong evidences against the fossil oil theory. <br>3. There was huge abiotic hydrocarbons lakes,rivers and ocean on the surface of the earth in past geological time like Titan.</span> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Euniversetoday%2Ecom%2F12800%2Ftitan-has-hundreds-of-times-more-liquid-hydrocarbons-than-earth%2F&urlhash=OKk9&_t=mbox_mebc" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;font-size:13px;font-family:inherit;vertical-align:baseline;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(0,102,153)" target="_blank">http://www.universetoday.com/12800/titan-has-hundreds-of-times-more-liquid-hydrocarbons-than-earth/</a> <span style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;font-size:13px;font-family:inherit;vertical-align:baseline">and out of these hydrocarbons heavy molecular weight ,sticky and waxy material has been reburied after mixing <br>
with the organic matter from the surface and organic matter has nothing to produce the oil and just has been mixed in pre generated abiotic hydrocarbons.sediments <br>that has been formed without any involvement of these abiotic hydrocarbons are Dry Holes only and we are getting nothing near there in spite of well established sediments <br>
4. source rock is a mixture of mud+organic matter+pre generated abiotic hydrocarbons and organic matter has nothing to produce the oil. <br>5. this theory can help to find new location of hydrocarbons under testable conditions. <br>
6. this theory has respect for the all valid evidences by the both current biotic and abiotic origin of hydrocarbons. <br><br>regs <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br>suresh </font></span></span></span><br>
</div>
</div><br></div>